Syllabus
Course Description and Overview:
We know a lot. We know that we exist, that we and others have conscious sensations, that seven and five are twelve, and that torturing innocent people is wrong. In part, we know these claims because we construct theories of knowledge, mind, mathematics, and ethics. But any theory must be checked against some data. Among these data are our intuitions: the way the world seems to us. Intuitions and Philosophy will explore the role of intuitions in our reasoning in epistemology, philosophy of mind, moral philosophy, metaphysics, and other areas. We will consider arguments in favor of using intuitions in philosophy, as well as research on the fallibility of ordinary reasoning. We will also examine some recent experimental results which call into question traditional philosophical methods and conclusions.
Texts
Michael DePaul and William Ramsey. Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman and Littlefield, 1998.
Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols. Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Additional Readings, available on reserve, and on the course website.
Class notes are here.
Other recommended sources are listed in the Course Bibliography.
Course Requirements
Your responsibilities this course include the following, with their contributions to your grade calculation in parentheses:
All the readings listed on the schedule below and seminar papers.Twenty article prècis (10%)
Two seminar papers (2-4 pages) and presentations (40%; 20% each)
Term paper (8-12 pages) (30%)
Final Exam (20%)
The readings on the schedule and any seminar paper for the day are to be completed before the class indicated. For additional readings, including background on the philosophical topics in Part III of the course, and full bibliographical information, see the Course Bibliography, available on the course website and as a handout.
Article prècis are 100- to 150- word summaries, or distillations, of some portion of an assigned reading. In preparing for most classes, you should write one prècis before class. You may choose to write about an entire article, or to focus on a small portion of the article. If there is more than one reading, you may choose one reading on which to focus. You need not complete prècis for the two classes in which you are presenting a seminar paper. In lieu of up to five prècis, you can write a list of six-to-eight detailed questions on the reading.
Your twenty prècis are due at the end of the term, on Friday, December 9. I may collect some portion of them earlier, especially if you display a need for me to do so. You will mainly be graded on the completion of the twenty prècis, rather than their quality. I expect that the prècis will be useful to you in preparing both for classes and for the final exam.
Many classes will run as extended discussions of a 750- to 1500-word seminar paper. Each student in the course will write and present two seminar papers. We will sign up for seminar papers and presentations, by email, after the second class meeting. Seminar papers should assimilate the assigned readings and summarize the main arguments. I also encourage you to include some critical analysis. You are instigating class discussion, focusing our thoughts on the central theses, and raising questions. It is good practice to end a seminar paper with a few questions you believe will be useful for the class to consider. Each seminar paper is due at noon by email to all seminar participants the day before the class in which it will be discussed (i.e. Monday or Wednesday). This deadline is necessary for all participants in the seminar to be able to read the paper and prepare comments and questions for class.
You will lead the class on the day we discuss your seminar paper. You may be creative with your presentation. You may focus on the content of your paper. You may also discuss any particular difficulties in the material, or topics that you were unable to cover in the paper. Your grade for the seminar paper will depend on both the paper and your presentation of it.
Your term papers will be completed in three stages. A one-to-two-paragraph abstract of your paper is due on Tuesday, October 18. A full draft of your term paper is due on Thursday, November 10. The final draft is due on Thursday, December 1. See the Paper Assignment for various options for topics. I will be happy to meet with you to discuss your topic, in advance. Failure to submit a draft or submitting an insufficient draft, will reduce your final paper grade by two steps (e.g. from B+ to B-).
The final exam will be on Friday, December 16, 2011, from 9am to noon. Preparatory questions will be posted on the course website.
On Grades: Grades on assignments will be posted on Blackboard, along with a running total, which I call your grade calculation. Your grade calculation is a guide for me to use in assigning you a final grade. There are no rules binding how I translate your grade calculation, which will appear in Blackboard as a percentage, into a letter grade. In particular, the Hamilton College key for translating your letter grades into percentages, used for graduate school admissions, is not a tool for calculating your final grade. I welcome further discussion of the purposes and methods of grading, as well as my own grading policies.
The Hamilton College Honor Code will be strictly enforced.
Office Hours
My office hours for the Fall 2011, term are 10:30am - noon, Monday through Friday. My office is upstairs in 202 College Hill Road.
Schedule:
Note: The readings listed in each row are to be completed before class.
Part I: Thought Experiments, Intuition and Reflective Equilibrium
Class |
Date |
Topic |
Readings to do before class |
Presenter |
1 |
Thursday |
Thought Experiments, Intuitions, and X-Phi |
Brown and Fehige, “Thought Experiments” |
|
2 |
Tuesday |
Foundationalism: Rationalism and Empiricism |
Descartes, selections from Meditations on First Philosophy and Objections and Replies |
|
3 |
Thursday |
Wittgenstein and the Logical Empiricists |
Melchert, “Analysis” |
|
4 |
Tuesday |
The Myth of the Given |
Sellars, “Does Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?” |
|
5 |
Thursday |
Reflective Equilibrium in Science |
Goodman, “The New Riddle of Induction” |
Jack |
6 |
Tuesday |
The Scientific Method |
Papineau, “Methodology: The Elements of the Philosophy of Science,” §1, §3, and §5 |
Julia |
7 |
Thursday |
Reflective Equilibrium in Ethics |
Rawls, from A Theory of Justice |
Mike |
8 |
Tuesday |
Reflective Equilibrium in Linguistics |
Chomsky, from Knowledge of Language, Chapters 1 and 2 |
Lindsay |
Part II: Worries About Rationality
Class |
Date |
Topic |
Readings to do before class |
|
9 |
Thursday |
Cognitive Biases |
Tversky and Kahneman, “Judgment Under Uncertainty:
Heuristics and Biases” |
|
10 |
Tuesday |
Catch Up |
|
|
| 11 | Thursday 9/29 |
Rationality and Experimentation | Cohen, “Can Human Irrationality Be Experimentally
Demonstrated” Replies from Evans and Pollard; Kahneman; and Stich |
Julia |
12 |
Tuesday |
Against Intuitions |
Stich and Nisbett, “Justification and the Psychology of Human Reasoning” |
Amanda |
Part III: X-Phi Against Intiutions
Class |
Date |
Topic |
Readings to do before class |
|
13 |
Thursday |
Epistemic Relativism |
Weinberg, Nichols, and Stich, “Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions” (EP 2) |
Emir |
14 |
Tuesday |
Free Will and Moral Responsibility I |
Woolfolk, Doris, and Darley, “Identification, Situation Constraint, and Social Cognition: Studies in Attribution of Moral Responsibility” (EP 4) |
Susannah |
15 |
Tuesday |
Free Will and Moral
Responsibility II |
Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, and Turner, “Is Incompatibilism Intuitive?” (EP 5) |
Lindsay |
16 |
Thursday |
Free Will and Moral Responsibility III |
Nichols and Knobe, “Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions” (EP 6) |
Mike |
17 |
Tuesday |
Intentionality |
Knobe, “The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology” (EP7) |
Jack |
18 |
Thursday |
Intuitions and Cognitive Equilibrium |
Gendler, “Philosophical Thought Experiments, Intuitions, and Cognitive Equilibrium” |
Amanda |
19 |
Tuesday
|
Gender Differences I |
Haslanger, "Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)" |
|
20 |
Thursday |
Emily Esch’s class visit |
Prinz, “Empirical Philosophy and Experimental Philosophy” (EP 10) |
|
Bonus |
Friday |
Emily Esch’s public talk (title TBA) |
|
|
21 |
Tuesday |
Gender Differences I |
Buckwalter and Stich, “Gender and Philosophical Intuition” |
Susannah |
Part IV: How to Do Philosophy
Class |
Date |
Topic |
Readings to do before class |
|
22 |
Thursday |
Intuition in Psychology |
Gopnik and Schwitzgebel, “Whose Concepts Are They, Anyway? The Role of Philosophical Intuition in Empirical Psychology” (DR 5) |
|
23 |
Tuesday |
Sources of Intuitions |
Cummins, “Reflections on Reflective Equilibrium” (DR7) |
|
24 |
Thursday |
Defending Intuition I |
Bealer, “Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy” (DR 12) |
|
25 |
Tuesday |
Defending Intuition II |
Bealer, “Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy” (DR 12) |
|
26 |
Thursday |
Naturalizing Intuition |
Kornblith, “The Role of Intuition in Philosophical Inquiry: An Account with No Unnatural Ingredients” (DR 8) |
|
27 |
Tuesday |
Intuitions and X-Phi |
Sosa, “Minimal Intuition” (DR 14) and “Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition” (EP 12) |
Emir |
28 |
Thursday |
Whither Reflective Equilibrium |
DePaul, “Why Bother with Reflective Equilibrium?” (DR 16) |
Twenty Article Prècis Due: Friday, December 9, 4pm
Final Exam: Friday December 16, 9am to noon