Berkeley Reading Guide 33. "In short, if there were external bodies, it is impossible we should ever come to know it; and if there were not, we might have the very same reasons to think there were that we have now." (§20) Explain. |
Back to Berkeley Reading Guide
|
|
Enter your response to the above question, or to a previous response, in the form below, or use this email link. I will post your response on the right, and comment if I think I can be helpful. When emailing, instead of using the form, please indicate the question number. When using the form below, if you neglect to enter your name or email, I won't know who you are. |
Class Responses and Instructor Comments
>From KAI YU and WAI YAN: For the same reason that we can't say there isn't any physical objects existing, we can't say there is physical objects existing.
>rm says: Is this Berkeley's position? Doesn't he emphatically deny the existence of physical objects? Read the quote carefully. |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |