Berkeley Reading Guide 19. How does Berkeley argue that the essence of unthinking things is their being perceived? |
Back to Berkeley Reading Guide
|
|
Enter your response to the above question, or to a previous response, in the form below, or use this email link. I will post your response on the right, and comment if I think I can be helpful. When emailing, instead of using the form, please indicate the question number. When using the form below, if you neglect to enter your name or email, I won't know who you are. |
Class Responses and Instructor Comments
>From nr: berkeley
argues this because, according to berkeley, unthinking objects cease
to exists unless they are percieved. their existence alone relies on
the object being percieved. >rm
says: This is true, but this is more the conclusion than the argument.
What are the reasons for thinking that objects must be perceived
to exist? |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |