Berkeley Reading Guide 13. How does the presupposition that each word stands for one thing lead to the doctrine of abstract ideas? Be specific. |
Back to Berkeley Reading Guide
|
|
Enter your response to the above question, or to a previous response, in the form below, or use this email link. I will post your response on the right, and comment if I think I can be helpful. When emailing, instead of using the form, please indicate the question number. When using the form below, if you neglect to enter your name or email, I won't know who you are. |
Class Responses and Instructor Comments
>From eddie: We
use of words to stand for outward marks of our internal ideas. Those
ideas being taken from particular things. The mind makes the particular
ideas received from particular objects to become general. Ideas taken
from particular beings become general representatives of all of the
same kind; and applicable to whatever exists conformable to such abstract
ideas. An example of this is a triangle. There are many different types
of triangles that look very different from each other but they all are
considered under the same name,triangle. >rm
says: This quote should be cited. Anyway, it's not far, but nor quite
on topic, either. |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |