METHODS OF MATHEMATICAL PROOF
Blatantly lifted from: http://pw1.netcom.com/%7Eshagbert/
If the proof of a theorem is not immediately apparent, it may be because you are trying the wrong approach. Below are some effective methods of proof that may aim you in the right direction.
| Proof by Obviousness | The proof is so clear that it need not be mentioned. |
| Proof by General Agreement | All in favor??... |
| Proof by Imagination | Well, we’ll pretend it’s true. |
| Proof by Convenience | It would be nice if this is true, so..." |
| Proof by Necessity | It had better be true or the whole structure of mathematics would crumble to the ground. |
| Proof by Plausibility | It sounds good, so it must be true. |
| Proof by Intimidation | Don’t be stupid. Of course it’s true. |
| Proof by Lack Of Time | Because of the time constraint, I’ll leave the proof to you. |
| Proof by Postponement | The proof for this is tedious, so it is given in the appendix. |
| Proof by Accident | Hey, what have we here? |
| Proof by Insignificance | Who really cares anyway? |
| Proof by Mumbo-Jumbo | &^#H@)(*#@&*RaØ^Îg |
| Proof by Profanity | (example omitted) |
| Proof by Definition | We’ll definite it to be true. |
| Proof by Tautology | It’s true because it’s true. |
| Proof by Plagiarism | As we see on page 289... |
| Proof by Lost Reference | I know I saw this somewhere... |
| Proof by Calculus | The proof requires calculus, so we’ll skip it. |
| Proof by Terror | When Intimidation fails... |
| Proof by Lack of Interest | Does anyone really want to see this? |
| Proof by Illegibility | ()*)($*&#)$ |
| Proof by Logic | If it is on the problem sheet, then it must be true. |
| Proof by Majority Rule | Only to be used is General Agreement is impossible. |
| Proof by Clever Variable Choice | Let ‘a’ be the number such that this proof works. |
| Proof by Tessellation | This proof is just the same as the last. |
| Proof by Divine Word | ...And the Lord said, ‘Let it be true; and it came to pass. |
| Proof by Stubbornness | I don’t care what you say! It is true! |
| Proof by Simplification | The proof reduces to the statement 1 + 1 = 2. |
| Proof by Hasty Generalization | Well, it works for 17, so it works for all reals. |
| Proof by Deception | Now everyone turn their backs. |
| Proof by Supplication | Oh, please, let it be true. |
| Proof by Poor Analogy | Well, it’s just like... |
| Proof by Avoidance | The limit of Proof by Postponement as ‘t’ approaches infinity. |
| Proof by Design | If it is not true in today’s math, invent a new system in which it is. |
| Proof by Intuition | I just have this gut feeling... |
| Proof by Authority | Well, Mr. Al Knoweth says it’s true, so it must be. |
| Proof by Hope | Would someone like to put #23 on the board? |
| Proof by Delay | That would be a good one to do over the weekend. |
| Proof by Coercion | That would be a good test question. |
| Proof by Bribe | Anyone need 100 points extra credit?? |
| Proof by Inability | The proof is beyond the scope of this course. |
| Proof by Speculation | A corollary of the ‘wild guess’ theorem. |
| Proof by Devaluation | The proof of this problem is trivial. |
| Proof by Piggy Back | The proof follows from the Law of Large Numbers. |
| Proof by Superior Training | Only Cal Tech grads would comprehend the proof. |
| Proof by General Consensus | Everyone knows that... |
| Proof by Appreciation | Let’s discuss the proof Mr. Smart’s class left on the board. |